|
Chantal Maillé and Micheline Nadeua
de Sève
“Le mouvement féministe sur la scène internationale”
La communication portera sur l’impact de certains aspects
de la mondialisation sur les revendications et les stratégies
de mobilisation des groupes de femmes dans le contexte québécois.
Nous tenterons d’examiner: 1) Dans quelle mesure et pourquoi
ces groupes qui luttent en faveur d’une plus grande justice
sociale et économique au sein de la société
québécoise recourent aux organisations gouvernementales
internationales et à des réseaux informels internationaux
pour faire avancer leurs intérêts et leur vision
particulière de l'équité dans les rapports
de sexe au plan local ou national; 2) Comment et dans quelle mesure
la mondialisation affecte la mise en forme de leurs stratégies
de revendication et de mobilisation. Les auteurs présenteront
des résultats préliminaires d’une recherche
terrain, menée auprès d’organisations non-gouvernementales
(ONG) québécoises qui représentent et défendent,
au plan politique, des groupes de femmes et leur insertion à
égalité avec les hommes dans la société.
Sur la foi de stratégies de résistance qui s’inscrivent
d’emblée en dehors des frontières nationales,
plusieurs auteur-e-s concluent au caractère transnational
de la dynamique sociopolitique au sein des territoires nationaux
modernes, annonçant dès lors, la fin ou l’affaiblissement
de l’État nation et des mutations radicales dans
la signification de la citoyenneté et du vivre ensemble
au sein des États nations. Les auteures discuteront également
du bien-fondé de cette assertion.
Makoto Maruyama
“Local Currency: Alternative Money or Complementary Money?”
From the very beginning of the use of Green Dollar in LETS communities,
it has been taken for granted that G Dollar will never be traded
in a money market.
Money without interest is the main characteristic of Silvio Gesell’s
Freiegeld (free money). G Dollar does not necessarily model itself
after free money, but the two monies have lots in. In this paper,
I will first illustrate the common feature of free money and Green
Dollar. Both currencies are aimed at facilitating the exchange
of goods and services in a community. They are also designed to
separate the markets of goods and services from the money market.
Then I will focus on the difference between the two. I will argue,
on the one hand, that Gesell’s free money is alternative,
rather than complementary to the modern money. The implication
of this argument will be that the local market with free money
would become independent and detached from the business cycle
of the world market. I will argue, on the other hand, that Green
Dollar is complementary, rather than alternative to the modern
money. G Dollar is used along with the modern money. G Dollar
assists the circulation of modern money where the latter does
not circulate in itself. I will then provide the bird’s
eye view of Japanese local currencies (this last part will be
the supplement to my previous presentation in Mexico City in 2001).
I will illustrate that Japanese local currencies become more and
more diverse and seem to attract more people to the community
activities.
Julie Maurais
“The Coexistence of Industries, NGOs and Governments in
Environmental Governance: The case of the Forestry Sector”
During the last 10 years, governments from industrialized countries
have modified their method of regulating environmental issues.
The traditional command and control measures are today considered
inefficient due to the administration costs and structures necessary
to implement them. The new approaches which have been adopted
focus more on flexible, voluntary and cooperative regulatory structures,
implying a modification of relations between governments, corporations
and civil society. According to this system of governance, the
private sector is not just part of the problem, but is also part
of the solution.
Certain tools have gained the favour of both government authorities
and industries. One of these is an auto-regulation system, which
is applied in different sectors like agriculture, fisheries as
well as in the forestry industry. The forestry sector is particularly
interesting due to the recent developments of forest certification
propelled by corporations: most of the existing certification
programs applied in industrialized countries have emerged following
industry initiatives.
However, enterprises are not the only actors implied in forest
certification. At the bases of this expanding private regulatory
movement, another group of actor has played and important role:
the NGOs. NGOs have initiated the certification movement by developing
the first certification program, the Forest Stewardship Council
(FSC). Business and NGOs are thus both implicated in those auto-regulatory
measures which seek better practices in forestry. Indeed, through
the application of forest certification, corporations of the forestry
sector take a voluntary step toward the implementation of measures
permitting to reach a higher degree of sustainable forest management.
Although NGOs and Industries are moving toward this new mode of
regulation, governments are not excluded from the process. Certification,
which is emerging as the new type of environmental governance,
is directly linked to the governmental authority. The role taken
by governments varies in degree but serves most of the time to
legitimate the action of industries and NGOs. Thus, my intention
is to clarify the new articulation of the different actors implicated
in the forest certification movement. This will lead to a better
comprehension of the transformation of the governance in the environmental
field.
Olga Navarro-Flores
“De la dépendance aux relations de partenariat : vers
une nouvelle coexistence Nord-Sud”
On s’entend généralement pour dire que les années
1990 se caractérisent par l’arrivée de la mondialisation,
qui constitue une accélération sans précédent
des échanges d’informations, de capitaux, de biens
et de services. L’arrivée de la mondialisation a suscité
une série de changements profonds s’étendant,
entre autres, vers la montée des partenariats, constituant
une nouvelle forme de coordination de l’activité économique,
alternative à la concurrence et à la hiérarchie
(Hollingsworth et Boyer, 1997). En effet, les corporations, les
États et les organisations locales non gouvernementales et
à but non lucratif établissent de plus en plus des
partenariats afin d’attirer des investissements et de créer
de l’emploi (Petrella, 1985), afin d’assurer la relève
des programmes sociaux (Favreau, 1996; Vaillancourt, 1996), et même
afin de s’attaquer à certains problèmes socioéconomiques
de la communauté (Loizides, 1994; Peterson et Sundblad, 1994).
Le concept fait désormais partie du langage courant dans
tous les secteurs socioéconomiques, de sorte que, même
dans le cadre de la coopération internationale, où
la mondialisation a si brusquement scindé le pouvoir Nord-Sud,
on assiste paradoxalement à l’émergence de nouvelles
relations de partenariat. Mais attention, car ce concept suppose
une relation entre pairs, dont l’utilisation et la pratique
pourraient nous conduire équivoquement à penser que
les partenariats équilibrent finalement les relations de
pouvoir entre les parties, ce qui n’est pas le cas. Nous tenterons
ici d’illustrer, à partir de deux études de
cas de coopération internationale, que les partenariats,
tels que vécus par les acteurs du Nord et du Sud, constituent
une manifestation particulière des rapports de pouvoir, laquelle,
étant plus égalitaire que la dépendance qui
caractérisait les débuts de la coopération,
promet un renouvellement des formes traditionnelles de coexistence
Nord-Sud.
Walter C. Neale
“Sir Henry Sumner Maine: Social Scientist for the Twenty-First
Century”
Few books have been as badly misunderstood as Maine’s Ancient
Law. The misunderstandings begin with a misinterpretation of the
famous line--“the movement of progressive societies has hitherto
been a movement from Status to Contract”--and go on to ignore
the major theme of the book: that the writing of history should
be based solely on evidence from that time and place. It also ignores
Maine’s attack upon systemic a prioris and natural law philosophy.
I propose to correct these misconceptions. First I shall show how
Maine’s text makes it clear that he is only dealing with Indo-European
societies and that ‘progressive’ means a society whose
laws and social structure are not embedded in religion. Then I shall
discuss how his attack upon natural law philosophy supports his
critique of ‘speculative history.’ Finally, I shall
show how the structure of the book lends support to the thesis that
it is a history of Roman law, an example of how to do good history,
and an example of how such history can be used to explain the interdependence
of law and portray social structure.
The relationship of this analysis of Ancient Law to the work of
Karl Polanyi will be brought out by showing how Maine’s and
Polanyi’s treatment of history complement and reinforce each
other.
Chris Nyland
“Marketization, Globalization and Social Protection Reform
in China: Implications for the Global Social Protection Debate and
Foreign Investors”
As part of its transition to a market economy and its integration
into the global economy China has initiated a major transformation
of its social protection regime. By social protection is meant "the
set of policies and programs designed to reduce poverty and vulnerability
by promoting efficient labor markets, diminishing people's exposure
to risks, and enhancing their capacity to protect themselves against
hazards and interruption/loss of income." (ADB 2001). The form
of social protection embraced by communities and governments can
impact significantly on the labor costs that accrue to firms and
consequently on the management strategies of enterprises and the
extent to which nations are attractive investment sites. Despite
this being the case, scholars have paid little attention to how
business practices are influenced by the social policies adopted
by governments. This omission contrasts with the contribution forthcoming
from social policy analysts in recent years. The onset of globalization
has induced a new level of interest in the response of the business
community to social reform by policy analysts because many have
come to fear that globalization may be undermining the capacity
of governments to sustain the levels of welfare that became the
norm across the OECD in the 1945-1975 period. In this paper we seek
to encourage the study of the implications of social policy for
international business by exploring the implications of emerging
social protection regime in China for investors. We have chosen
China as the focus of our study because it has become the world's
second largest recipient of foreign direct investment after the
USA and because it is a nation that is currently undertaking a major
overhaul of its social protection regime as a part of its strategy
for integrating into the global economy. The paper begins by introducing
the literature that has explored the link between social protection
and labor markets and in so doing highlights the fact that the major
global financial agencies now accept that a sound social protection
regime is a necessary feature of a successful globalization strategy.
We next proceed to detail the nature of the reforms being implemented
in China and undertake two case studies that add important details
to our broader discussion. Finally, we consider the likely implications
of these developments for the global social protection debate and
for investors undertaking business activity in China.
|